Saturday, 18 April 2015

Why the government should be funding mass scientific studies of Ecstasy, magic mushrooms, and LSD

Medical drugs are pretty nice. From antibiotics to chemotherapy to good old aspirin, not a day goes by that millions of people don't benefit from pharmaceutical medicine — even granting the occasional disaster.

But the American model of drug development is badly flawed. We use a patent system, so new drugs that make it through the approval process can enjoy a government-granted monopoly to make back the initial investment. But for treatments in which the patent doesn't work — either because the drug won't be widely used, or because it is already in the public domain — our system comes up short. Two recent stories, regarding antibiotics and psychedelics, including LSD and Ecstasy, illustrate the problem, as well as the solution.

Undoubtedly the more serious problem is with antibiotics, which are basically the foundation of modern medicine. Without them, there would be no transplant surgery and very little cancer treatment. Pneumonia and tuberculosis would kill millions yearly. Minor cuts and scrapes would again be potentially life-threatening — antibiotic-resistant infections already kill 23,000 people in the U.S. alone every year.

Furthermore, our current stock of antibiotics is being eclipsed by bacterial evolution, which makes diseases more resistant to drugs. Meanwhile, new antibiotic discoveries have been quite thin on the ground in recent years. That's why the potential discovery of a new antibiotic from a soil sample made headlines across the globe. Though it still has to make it through a slew of scientific hurdles to prove it's safe for humans (and the odds are very much against it), it would be the first new antibiotic in years.

There are many reasons for this dearth of discovery. But as Kevin Outterson points out, the patent model greatly exacerbates the problem. Any new antibiotic approved for use in humans will be immediately and rightly seized by the medical profession to make sure society can get the longest possible use out of it. Especially at first, prescriptions — and therefore drug company revenues — would be sharply limited. Indeed, over-marketing of antibiotics is a big part of what caused the resistance crisis in the first place. That, in turn, makes drug companies more reluctant to invest in new antibiotic research.

A different problem is when a potential medical use for a substance is found, but its patent has already lapsed. Any public-domain compound still has to undergo the studies to get FDA approval; but without the monopoly profits, no drug company will bother doing that science.

Psychedelics, such as psilocybin (one of the active ingredients in magic mushrooms) and LSD, are currently stuck in this limbo. As Michael Pollan details in a riveting and brilliant piece for The New Yorker, the science on psychedelics is making a comeback. After the 1960s, there was a decades-long crackdown on such research, sparked by irresponsible grandstanding by clowns like Timothy Leary on the one hand, and a far worse overreaction and backlash in mainstream society on the other. But in recent years, a dedicated group of researchers has been producing some solid research on various psychedelic compounds.

Though still preliminary, the results are nothing short of astounding. Whether it's MDMA (the active ingredient in Ecstasy) used to treat PTSD among veterans, or LSD used to treat anxiety and depression among the terminally ill, or psilocybin used to treat addiction, studies employing ordinary, conservative scientific techniques are finding hugely positive results.

The problem is that large-scale studies are needed to obtain final FDA approval, which makes them very expensive. Here's Pollan:

Recruitment is only one of the many challenges facing a Phase III trial of psilocybin, which would involve hundreds of patients at multiple locations and cost millions of dollars. The University of Wisconsin and the University of California, Los Angeles, are making plans to participate in such a trial, but F.D.A. approval is not guaranteed. [The New Yorker]

No drug company would waste money on those studies. It would be financially irresponsible.

So what is to be done? First, direct government funding is and always has been an important part of scientific funding. In a sane world, with substances as promising as the above psychedelics, the government would simply fund the research itself and be done with it. Only an increasingly anachronistic brand of drug warrior politics stands in the way. But with something like 22 veterans per day committing suicide, any treatment with a potential 60+ percent long-tem cure rate for PTSD ought to be jammed through mass trials at the highest possible speed.

Second, the patent model could be altered or abolished altogether. As Dean Baker and others have proposed, a prize fund might be set up, by which the government would propose various desired treatments, with the winnings given out to any drug that makes it through the FDA's approval process (which should be streamlined itself, but that's another post). A new broad-spectrum antibiotic might be awarded \$20 billion, which would then pass into the public domain so it could be available at low cost.

It's important to note that, contrary to certain conservative objections, this would only be changing, not increasing, the government's involvement in the drug market. Arguably, setting up a prize fund would involve less such intervention, since there would be fewer government-granted market monopolies.

At any rate, there are many other options we might consider. But the important thing to remember is that when it comes to medical science, there's simply no getting around government involvement — and we could be doing ours a lot better.

 
#science 
 » see original post http://theweek.com/articles/537694/why-government-should-funding-mass-scientific-studies-ecstasy-magic-mushrooms-lsd

Layered Glass Sculptures Mimic the Everyday Drama of the Natural World

White Water

White Water, all images provided by K. William LeQuier

Plume

Plume

Medusa

Medusa

Maelstrom

Maelstrom

Euphoria

Euphoria

Curl No. 5

Curl No. 5

Cabriole

Cabriole

Glass artist K. William LeQuier‘s glass work is inspired by the drama of the natural world and its everyday events. His sculptures reflect this inspiration by mimicking the natural movements of the sea and its creatures. Each sculpture is held steady by a simple black armature, a hint to the artist’s hand involved in the creation of each glass sculpture.

After years of blowing glass vessels LeQuier moved to the sandblasting process where he learned he could generate textures similar to natural erosion. In addition to forming works that appear as waves, he creates work reminiscent of sea urchins, sponges, and anemones. Most interesting about the sculptures are their layered composition, a complexity that could easily be looked over due to the high level of skill apparent in each sea-themed object.

Currently LeQuier lives and works in Vermont with his wife Mary Angus. His work can be found in the permanent collections of museums across the country including (but not limited to) the American Glass Museum, Indianapolis Art Museum, National Liberty Museum, and Philadelphia Museum of Art. (via My Modern Met)

 
#funandrandom 
 » see original post http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/colossal/~3/2NxB_dmzeqk/

Metazoa: Mixed-Media Cabinets by ‘ROA’ Reveal the Hidden Anatomy of Animals

roa-1
Composition II: Lutrinate, Salmonidae, Anguilliformes

Belgian artist ROA (previously) just opened his first solo show at Jonathan LeVine Gallery in NYC titled Metazoa. The new series of mixed media works feature the artist’s familiar black and white depictions of animals painted on various cabinet-like furniture pieces that can be opened or shifted to reveal anatomical details. ROA often chooses to depict animals native to where he is working, specifically species that have been forced from their native habitats and now live on the outskirts of urban areas. Here’s a comment about ROA’s decision to depict the beaver, New York’s state animal, via Jonathan LeVine:

ROA views the beaver, the state animal of New York, as a metaphor for the idea that nature has the ability to reclaim itself. The recovery of the beaver in New York City after it was previously thought extinct is exemplary of how humans and animals affect each other and reflects the artist’s interest in how animals evolve within urban landscapes. Wherever man settles, the desire to explore beyond the borders of survival leads to the extinction of species. This extermination due to mankind’s impact not only disrupts the natural balance but also leads to drastic cosmic changes, which ROA aims to convey by depicting the life, transience and carrion of animals.

Metazoa will be on view through May 2, and you can see plenty more gallery views and an interview with the artist during a studio visit on Arrested Motion from earlier this year.

roa-2
Composition I: Castor, Didelphimorphia, Sciuridae

roa-3
Composition I: Castor, Didelphimorphia, Sciuridae (DETAIL)

roa-4
Cervidae Tableau Dormant

roa-7
Composition III: Alligatoridae, Testudinidae, Gastropoda

roa-5
Erethizon Dorsatum

roa-8
NY Canidae

roa-6
Sylvilagus Audubonii

roa-9
Cabinet Specula Crania

 
#funandrandom 
 » see original post http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/colossal/~3/5uq1HGSM_wc/